0.10/0.25	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.10/0.25	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.10/0.51	% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
0.10/0.51	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.51	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.51	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.51	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.51	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.10/0.51	% WCLimit    : 180
0.10/0.51	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 09:05:54 EDT 2024
0.10/0.52	% CPUTime    : 
0.21/0.68	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.21/0.68	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.30uewXHl5C/E---3.1_5452.p
0.21/0.70	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.21/0.70	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLMNHSA.
0.21/0.70	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.70	# Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores
0.21/0.70	# Starting new_ho_7 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.70	# Starting lpo8_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.70	# Starting lpo9_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.70	# lpo8_lambda_fix with pid 5532 completed with status 0
0.21/0.70	# Result found by lpo8_lambda_fix
0.21/0.70	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLMNHSA.
0.21/0.70	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.70	# Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores
0.21/0.70	# Starting new_ho_7 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.70	# Starting lpo8_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.70	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,5.0,,4,20000,1.0)
0.21/0.70	# Search class: HHUSF-FFSF32-SHSFMSBN
0.21/0.70	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.21/0.70	# Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores
0.21/0.70	# new_ho_10 with pid 5539 completed with status 0
0.21/0.70	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.21/0.70	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLMNHSA.
0.21/0.70	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.70	# Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores
0.21/0.70	# Starting new_ho_7 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.70	# Starting lpo8_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.70	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,5.0,,4,20000,1.0)
0.21/0.70	# Search class: HHUSF-FFSF32-SHSFMSBN
0.21/0.70	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.21/0.70	# Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores
0.21/0.70	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.21/0.70	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.21/0.70	
0.21/0.70	# Proof found!
0.21/0.70	# SZS status Theorem
0.21/0.70	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.21/0.70	thf(decl_22, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.70	thf(decl_23, type, dsetconstr: $i > ($i > $o) > $i).
0.21/0.70	thf(decl_24, type, dsetconstrER: $o).
0.21/0.70	thf(decl_25, type, kpair: $i > $i > $i).
0.21/0.70	thf(decl_26, type, cartprod: $i > $i > $i).
0.21/0.70	thf(decl_27, type, setukpairinjL: $o).
0.21/0.70	thf(decl_28, type, setukpairinjR: $o).
0.21/0.70	thf(decl_29, type, dpsetconstr: $i > $i > ($i > $i > $o) > $i).
0.21/0.70	thf(decl_30, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.21/0.70	thf(decl_31, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.21/0.70	thf(decl_32, type, epred1_0: $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.70	thf(decl_33, type, esk3_0: $i).
0.21/0.70	thf(decl_34, type, esk4_0: $i).
0.21/0.70	thf(decl_35, type, epred2_3: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.70	thf(decl_36, type, esk5_4: $i > $i > $i > ($i > $i > $o) > $i).
0.21/0.70	thf(decl_37, type, esk6_4: $i > $i > $i > ($i > $i > $o) > $i).
0.21/0.70	thf(dsetconstrER, axiom, ((dsetconstrER)<=>![X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((in @ X3 @ (dsetconstr @ X1 @ (^[X4:$i]:((X2 @ X4)))))=>(X2 @ X3)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.30uewXHl5C/E---3.1_5452.p', dsetconstrER)).
0.21/0.70	thf(dpsetconstrER, conjecture, (((setukpairinjL)=>(![X1:$i, X7:$i, X9:$i > $i > $o, X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((in @ (kpair @ X3 @ X4) @ (dpsetconstr @ X1 @ X7 @ (^[X5:$i, X6:$i]:((X9 @ X5 @ X6)))))=>(X9 @ X3 @ X4)))<=(setukpairinjR)))<=(dsetconstrER)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.30uewXHl5C/E---3.1_5452.p', dpsetconstrER)).
0.21/0.70	thf(setukpairinjL, axiom, ((setukpairinjL)<=>![X3:$i, X4:$i, X5:$i, X6:$i]:((((kpair @ X3 @ X4)=(kpair @ X5 @ X6))=>((X3)=(X5))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.30uewXHl5C/E---3.1_5452.p', setukpairinjL)).
0.21/0.70	thf(setukpairinjR, axiom, ((setukpairinjR)<=>![X3:$i, X4:$i, X5:$i, X6:$i]:((((kpair @ X3 @ X4)=(kpair @ X5 @ X6))=>((X4)=(X6))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.30uewXHl5C/E---3.1_5452.p', setukpairinjR)).
0.21/0.70	thf(dpsetconstr, axiom, ((dpsetconstr)=(^[X1:$i, X7:$i, X8:$i > $i > $o]:(dsetconstr @ (cartprod @ X1 @ X7) @ (^[X6:$i]:(?[X3:$i]:(((in @ X3 @ X1)&?[X4:$i]:((((in @ X4 @ X7)&(X8 @ X3 @ X4))&((X6)=(kpair @ X3 @ X4))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.30uewXHl5C/E---3.1_5452.p', dpsetconstr)).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_5, plain, ((dsetconstrER)<=>![X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((in @ X3 @ (dsetconstr @ X1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:((X2 @ Z0)))))=>(X2 @ X3)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dsetconstrER])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~((![X34:$i, X35:$i > $o, X36:$i]:(((in @ X36 @ (dsetconstr @ X34 @ X35))=>(X35 @ X36)))=>(![X26:$i, X27:$i, X28:$i, X29:$i]:((((kpair @ X26 @ X27)=(kpair @ X28 @ X29))=>((X26)=(X28))))=>(![X30:$i, X31:$i, X32:$i, X33:$i]:((((kpair @ X30 @ X31)=(kpair @ X32 @ X33))=>((X31)=(X33))))=>![X1:$i, X7:$i, X9:$i > $i > $o, X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((in @ (kpair @ X3 @ X4) @ (dpsetconstr @ X1 @ X7 @ X9))=>(X9 @ X3 @ X4))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[dpsetconstrER])]), c_0_5]), setukpairinjL]), setukpairinjR])])])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X40:$i, X41:$i > $o, X42:$i, X43:$i, X44:$i, X45:$i, X46:$i, X47:$i, X48:$i, X49:$i, X50:$i]:(((~(in @ X42 @ (dsetconstr @ X40 @ X41))|(X41 @ X42))&((((kpair @ X43 @ X44)!=(kpair @ X45 @ X46))|((X43)=(X45)))&((((kpair @ X47 @ X48)!=(kpair @ X49 @ X50))|((X48)=(X50)))&((in @ (kpair @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0) @ (dpsetconstr @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ epred1_0))&~(epred1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X62:$i, X63:$i, X64:$i, X65:$i > $i > $o, X68:$i, X69:$i]:(((((in @ (esk5_4 @ X62 @ X63 @ X64 @ X65) @ X63)|~(epred2_3 @ X65 @ X64 @ X63 @ X62))&((((in @ (esk6_4 @ X62 @ X63 @ X64 @ X65) @ X64)|~(epred2_3 @ X65 @ X64 @ X63 @ X62))&((X65 @ (esk5_4 @ X62 @ X63 @ X64 @ X65) @ (esk6_4 @ X62 @ X63 @ X64 @ X65))|~(epred2_3 @ X65 @ X64 @ X63 @ X62)))&(((X62)=(kpair @ (esk5_4 @ X62 @ X63 @ X64 @ X65) @ (esk6_4 @ X62 @ X63 @ X64 @ X65)))|~(epred2_3 @ X65 @ X64 @ X63 @ X62))))&(~(in @ X68 @ X63)|(~(in @ X69 @ X64)|~(X65 @ X68 @ X69)|((X62)!=(kpair @ X68 @ X69)))|(epred2_3 @ X65 @ X64 @ X63 @ X62)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[])])])])])])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X37:$i, X38:$i, X39:$i > $i > $o]:(((dpsetconstr @ X37 @ X38 @ X39)=(dsetconstr @ (cartprod @ X37 @ X38) @ (^[Z0/* 5 */:$i]:(?[X3:$i]:(((in @ X3 @ X37)&?[X4:$i]:((((in @ X4 @ X38)&X39 @ X3 @ X4)&((Z0)=(kpair @ X3 @ X4))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dpsetconstr])])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X4:$i, X5:$i]:((((X3)=(X5))|((kpair @ X1 @ X3)!=(kpair @ X4 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X8:$i > $i > $o, X4:$i, X3:$i, X1:$i]:((((X1)=(kpair @ (esk5_4 @ X1 @ X3 @ X4 @ X8) @ (esk6_4 @ X1 @ X3 @ X4 @ X8)))|~((epred2_3 @ X8 @ X4 @ X3 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X56:$i, X57:$i, X58:$i > $i > $o]:(((dpsetconstr @ X56 @ X57 @ X58)=(dsetconstr @ (cartprod @ X56 @ X57) @ (^[Z0/* 5 */:$i]:(?[X3:$i]:(((in @ X3 @ X56)&?[X4:$i]:((((in @ X4 @ X57)&X58 @ X3 @ X4)&((Z0)=(kpair @ X3 @ X4))))))))))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X61:$i, X1:$i, X3:$i, X8:$i > $i > $o]:(((epred2_3 @ X8 @ X3 @ X1 @ X61)<=>?[X59:$i]:(((in @ X59 @ X1)&?[X60:$i]:((((in @ X60 @ X3)&(X8 @ X59 @ X60))&((X61)=(kpair @ X59 @ X60)))))))), introduced(definition)).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X8:$i > $i > $o, X4:$i, X3:$i, X1:$i]:(((X8 @ (esk5_4 @ X1 @ X3 @ X4 @ X8) @ (esk6_4 @ X1 @ X3 @ X4 @ X8))|~((epred2_3 @ X8 @ X4 @ X3 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X8:$i > $i > $o, X5:$i, X4:$i, X3:$i]:((((esk6_4 @ (kpair @ X1 @ X3) @ X4 @ X5 @ X8)=(X3))|~((epred2_3 @ X8 @ X5 @ X4 @ (kpair @ X1 @ X3))))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X4:$i, X5:$i]:((((X1)=(X4))|((kpair @ X1 @ X3)!=(kpair @ X4 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X2:$i > $o]:(((X2 @ X1)|~((in @ X1 @ (dsetconstr @ X3 @ X2))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X8:$i > $i > $o, X3:$i, X1:$i]:(((dpsetconstr @ X1 @ X3 @ X8)=(dsetconstr @ (cartprod @ X1 @ X3) @ (epred2_3 @ X8 @ X3 @ X1)))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]), c_0_13])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X1:$i, X8:$i > $i > $o, X5:$i, X4:$i, X3:$i]:(((X8 @ (esk5_4 @ (kpair @ X1 @ X3) @ X4 @ X5 @ X8) @ X3)|~((epred2_3 @ X8 @ X5 @ X4 @ (kpair @ X1 @ X3))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X8:$i > $i > $o, X5:$i, X4:$i, X3:$i]:((((esk5_4 @ (kpair @ X1 @ X3) @ X4 @ X5 @ X8)=(X1))|~((epred2_3 @ X8 @ X5 @ X4 @ (kpair @ X1 @ X3))))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_11])])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X4:$i, X3:$i, X8:$i > $i > $o]:(((epred2_3 @ X8 @ X1 @ X3 @ X4)|~((in @ X4 @ (dpsetconstr @ X3 @ X1 @ X8))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (in @ (kpair @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0) @ (dpsetconstr @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ epred1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X8:$i > $i > $o, X5:$i, X4:$i, X3:$i]:(((X8 @ X1 @ X3)|~((epred2_3 @ X8 @ X4 @ X5 @ (kpair @ X1 @ X3))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, (epred2_3 @ epred1_0 @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0 @ (kpair @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.21/0.70	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24]), c_0_25]), ['proof']).
0.21/0.70	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.21/0.70	# Parsed axioms                        : 13
0.21/0.70	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 8
0.21/0.70	# Initial clauses                      : 11
0.21/0.70	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.21/0.70	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 11
0.21/0.70	# Processed clauses                    : 58
0.21/0.70	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.21/0.70	# ...subsumed                          : 9
0.21/0.70	# ...remaining for further processing  : 49
0.21/0.70	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5
0.21/0.70	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.21/0.70	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.21/0.70	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.21/0.70	# Generated clauses                    : 165
0.21/0.70	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 155
0.21/0.70	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.21/0.70	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.21/0.70	# Paramodulations                      : 158
0.21/0.70	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.21/0.70	# NegExts                              : 0
0.21/0.70	# Equation resolutions                 : 7
0.21/0.70	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.21/0.70	# Total rewrite steps                  : 0
0.21/0.70	# ...of those cached                   : 0
0.21/0.70	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.21/0.70	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.21/0.70	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.21/0.70	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.21/0.70	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.21/0.70	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.21/0.70	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.21/0.70	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.21/0.70	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.21/0.70	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.21/0.70	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.21/0.70	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.21/0.70	# Current number of processed clauses  : 37
0.21/0.70	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
0.21/0.70	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.21/0.70	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.21/0.70	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 31
0.21/0.70	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 115
0.21/0.70	# ...number of literals in the above   : 374
0.21/0.70	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.21/0.70	# Current number of archived clauses   : 11
0.21/0.70	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 110
0.21/0.70	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65
0.21/0.70	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 9
0.21/0.70	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.21/0.70	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.21/0.70	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.21/0.70	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.21/0.70	# Condensation attempts                : 58
0.21/0.70	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.21/0.70	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 3549
0.21/0.70	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 536
0.21/0.70	
0.21/0.70	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.70	# User time                : 0.003 s
0.21/0.70	# System time              : 0.007 s
0.21/0.70	# Total time               : 0.010 s
0.21/0.70	# Maximum resident set size: 1928 pages
0.21/0.70	
0.21/0.70	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.70	# User time                : 0.003 s
0.21/0.70	# System time              : 0.009 s
0.21/0.70	# Total time               : 0.012 s
0.21/0.70	# Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
0.21/0.70	% E---3.1 exiting
0.21/0.70	% E exiting
0.21/0.71	EOF